| Docket Number | 25-498 |
| Term | 2026 |
| Full Name | Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee |
| Short Name | Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee |
| Petitioner | None |
| Respondent | None |
| Date Argued (Reargued) | Oct. 6, 2026 |
| Date Decided |
Whether, for claims predicated on fund underperformance, pleading that an Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary failed to use the requisite “care, skill, prudence, or diligence” under the circumstances and thus breached ERISA’s duty of prudence when investing plan assets requires alleging a “meaningful benchmark.”
| Total Prediction Count | 18 |
| Votes for Justice Affirm | 7 |
| Votes to Justice Reverse | 11 |
| % Justice (A)ffirm/(R)everse |
62 (R)
|
| Votes for Outcome Affirm | 1 |
| Votes for Outcome Reverse | 1 |
| % Outcome (A)ffirm/(R)everse |
50 (A)
|
| Predicted Outcome |
Affirm
|
© 2014-2019 Josh Blackman LLC Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Rules