Want to make your own predictions?

  Join Now!


  • Outcome Prediction Evolution Chart
  • Justice Predictions Evolution Table

Case Profile

Docket Number25-498
Term2026
Full NameAnderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee
Short NameAnderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee
PetitionerNone
RespondentNone
Date Argued (Reargued)Oct. 6, 2026
Date Decided

Question Presented

Whether, for claims predicated on fund underperformance, pleading that an Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary failed to use the requisite “care, skill, prudence, or diligence” under the circumstances and thus breached ERISA’s duty of prudence when investing plan assets requires alleging a “meaningful benchmark.”

Case Prediction Summary

- correct prediction- wrong prediction
Total Prediction Count18
Votes for Justice Affirm7
Votes to Justice Reverse11
% Justice (A)ffirm/(R)everse
62 (R)
Votes for Outcome Affirm1
Votes for Outcome Reverse1
% Outcome (A)ffirm/(R)everse
50 (A)
Predicted Outcome
Affirm

User Predictions Summary

Recent Prediction Activity last 10 predictions

« Back to the case list