RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up

FantasySCOTUS Case Tracker

Cases Argued: 85
Cases Decided: 45
Cases Remaining: 40
Cases correctly predicted: 73.3%
Cases incorrectly predicted: 26.7%

85 items « of 1 »

CaseFantasySCOTUS PredictionOutcomeDate DecidedAccuracy
CaseFantasySCOTUS PredictionOutcomeDate DecidedAccuracy
LA County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources DefenseReverse  Reverse01-08-2013Correct
Horne v. Dep't of AgricultureReverse  n/a--
Trevino v. ThalerReverse  n/a--
U.S. Airways v. McCutchenReverse  Reverse04-15-2013Correct
Levin v. U.S.Reverse  Reverse03-04-2013Correct
Florida v. HarrisReverse  Reverse02-18-2013Correct
Willis of Colorado Inc. v. TroiceReverse  n/a--
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. BartlettReverse  n/a--
Georgia-Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterReverse  Reverse03-20-2013Correct
Comcast v. BehrendReverse  Affirm03-26-2013Incorrect
FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health SystemReverse  Reverse02-18-2013Correct
U.S. v. BormesReverse  Reverse11-12-2012Correct
Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinReverse  n/a--
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterReverse  Reverse03-19-2013Correct
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad GeneticsReverse  n/a--
Tibbals v. CarterReverse  Reverse01-07-2013Correct
Henderson v. U.S.Reverse  Reverse02-19-2013Correct
Maracich v. SpearsReverse  n/a--
Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of ArizonaReverse  n/a--
Proskauer Rose LLP v. TroiceReverse  n/a--
Gunn v. MintonReverse  Reverse02-19-2013Correct
Johnson v. WilliamsReverse  Reverse02-19-2013Correct
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarReverse  n/a--
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & SonsReverse  Reverse03-18-2013Correct
Metrish v. LancasterReverse  Reverse05-20-2013Correct
Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsReverse  Affirm02-26-2013Incorrect
Moncrieffe v. HolderReverse  Reverse04-23-2013Correct
Salinas v. TexasReverse  n/a--
Ryan v. GonzalesReverse  Reverse01-07-2013Correct
Shelby County v. HolderReverse  n/a--
Tennant v. Jefferson County CommissionReverse  n/a09-25-2012-
U.S. v. KebodeauxReverse  n/a--
Sebelius v. CloerReverse  Affirm05-20-2013Incorrect
Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange CommissionReverse  Reverse02-26-2013Correct
Bailey v. U.S.Affirm  Reverse02-18-2013Incorrect
Hillman v. MarettaAffirm  n/a--
Evans v. MichiganAffirm  Reverse02-19-2013Incorrect
PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueAffirm  Reverse05-20-2013Incorrect
Millbrook v. U.S.Affirm  Reverse03-26-2013Incorrect
Chafin v. ChafinAffirm  Reverse02-18-2013Incorrect
Bond v. U.S.Affirm  n/a--
Sekhar v. U.S.Affirm  n/a--
Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterAffirm  Reverse01-22-2013Incorrect
The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesAffirm  Reverse03-18-2013Incorrect
U.S. DavilaAffirm  n/a--
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. U.S.Affirm  Reverse12-03-2012Incorrect
Maryland v. KingAffirm  n/a--
McQuiggin v. PerkinsAffirm  n/a--
Clapper v. Amnesty InternationalAffirm  Affirm02-26-2013Correct
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. SutterAffirm  n/a--
Lozman v. City of Riviera BeachAffirm  Reverse01-14-2013Incorrect
Peugh v. U.S.Affirm  n/a--
Missouri v. McNeelyAffirm  Affirm04-16-2013Correct
Agency for Int'l Deveopment v. Alliance for Open Society Int'lAffirm  n/a--
Tarrant Regional Water District v. HerrmannAffirm  n/a--
Descamps v. U.S.Affirm  n/a--
McBurney v. YoungAffirm  Affirm04-28-2013Correct
Alleyne v. U.S.Affirm  n/a--
Kloeckner v. SolisAffirm  Reverse12-09-2012Incorrect
Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlAffirm  n/a--
Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Affirm  Affirm01-08-2013Correct
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykAffirm  Affirm04-15-2013Correct
Chaidez v. U.S.Affirm  Affirm02-19-2013Correct
Dan's City Used Cars v. PelkeyAffirm  Affirm05-12-2013Correct
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing?Affirm  n/a--
Federal Trade Commission v. ActavisAffirm  n/a--
American Trucking Associations v. City of Los AngelesAffirm  n/a--
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantAffirm  n/a--
Lefemine v. WidemanAffirm  n/a11-05-2012-
Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCCAffirm  n/a--
Vance v. Ball State UniversityAffirm  n/a--
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceAffirm  n/a--
United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing?Affirm  n/a--
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause?Affirm  n/a--
City of Arlington v. FCCAffirm  Affirm05-20-2013Correct
Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Affirm  Affirm02-26-2013Correct
Smith v. U.S.Affirm  Affirm01-08-2013Correct
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch PetroleumAffirm  Affirm04-16-2013Correct
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management DistrictAffirm  n/a--
Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A.Affirm  Affirm03-19-2013Correct
United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction?Affirm  n/a--
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.Affirm  Affirm05-12-2013Correct
Florida v. JardinesAffirm  Affirm03-26-2013Correct
United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles?Affirm  n/a--
Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A.Affirm  Reverse05-12-2013Incorrect
85 items « 1 of 1 »