Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: jcm5653

Joined:	March 3, 2013
Predictions:	76 / 179 ( 42%)
Points:	1,270
Ranking (2012):	68
Ranking (2011):	Unranked
Law School:	Penn State University Dickinson School of Law

Leagues

jcm5653 is a member of the following leagues:

Penn State University Dickinson School of Law, The TWEN League

Predictions

Case	Roberts	Scalia	Kennedy	Thomas	Ginsburg	Breyer	Alito	Sotomayor	Kagan	Prediction	Points
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Moncrieffe v. Holder	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	60
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	60
Florida v. Jardines	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
Comcast v. Behrend	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	80
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	40
Vance v. Ball State University	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	80
U.S. Airways v. McCutchen	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	40
The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Descamps v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause?	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing?	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles?	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction?	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing?	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Georgia-Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Recuse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	50
Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	60
Maracich v. Spears	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Missouri v. McNeely	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	50
Alleyne v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCC	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
City of Arlington v. FCC	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	60
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Millbrook v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	30
McBurney v. Young	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	40
PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	100
McQuiggin v. Perkins	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Trevino v. Thaler	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Maryland v. King	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Peugh v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Recuse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Shelby County v. Holder	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Sebelius v. Cloer	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	30
Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Recuse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Lefemine v. Wideman	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Tennant v. Jefferson County Commission	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
U.S. Davila	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
U.S. v. Kebodeaux	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Metrish v. Lancaster	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	20
Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Willis of Colorado Inc. v. Troice	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Agency for Int'l Deveopment v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Bond v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Hillman v. Maretta	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Salinas v. Texas	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Sekhar v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-

Change FantasySCOTUS Member: jcm5653

Leagues

Predictions

Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: jcm5653