Change FantasySCOTUS Member: tmpour
Change
| Joined: | January 29, 2013 |
| Predictions: | 126 / 215 ( 59%) |
| Points: | 3,050 |
| Ranking (2012): | 17 |
| Ranking (2011): | Unranked |
| Law School: | Southern Illinois University School of Law |
Leagues
tmpour is a member of the following leagues:
Southern Illinois University School of Law, The TWEN League
Predictions
| Case | Roberts | Scalia | Kennedy | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | Sotomayor | Kagan | Prediction | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Johnson v. Williams | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Moncrieffe v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Clapper v. Amnesty International | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Chaidez v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 20 |
| Bailey v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Florida v. Jardines | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Florida v. Harris | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Comcast v. Behrend | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Evans v. Michigan | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Marx v. General Revenue Corp. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 20 |
| Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Vance v. Ball State University | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. Airways v. McCutchen | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Chafin v. Chafin | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Henderson v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Descamps v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Georgia-Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Maracich v. Spears | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Missouri v. McNeely | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Alleyne v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Levin v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCC | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| City of Arlington v. FCC | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Gunn v. Minton | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Bowman v. Monsanto Co. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Millbrook v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| McBurney v. Young | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| McQuiggin v. Perkins | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Trevino v. Thaler | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Maryland v. King | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Peugh v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Shelby County v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Sebelius v. Cloer | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Lefemine v. Wideman | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Recuse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |
| Tennant v. Jefferson County Commission | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| U.S. Davila | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| U.S. v. Kebodeaux | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Metrish v. Lancaster | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Willis of Colorado Inc. v. Troice | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Agency for Int'l Deveopment v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Bond v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Hillman v. Maretta | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Salinas v. Texas | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Sekhar v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |