Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: narcher007

Joined:	January 29, 2013
Predictions:	80 / 178 ( 45%)
Points:	1,340
Ranking (2012):	72
Ranking (2011):	Unranked

Leagues

narcher007 is a member of the following leagues:

The League of Grover

Predictions

Case	Roberts	Scalia	Kennedy	Thomas	Ginsburg	Breyer	Alito	Sotomayor	Kagan	Prediction	Points
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	60
Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	40
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Moncrieffe v. Holder	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	60
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	40
Clapper v. Amnesty International	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	30
Florida v. Jardines	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	60
Comcast v. Behrend	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	30
Marx v. General Revenue Corp.	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Recuse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	50
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	20
Vance v. Ball State University	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	30
U.S. Airways v. McCutchen	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	20
The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	40
Descamps v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause?	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing?	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles?	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	-
United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction?	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing?	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Georgia-Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	20
Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A.	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	60
Maracich v. Spears	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Missouri v. McNeely	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Recuse	Reverse	20
Alleyne v. U.S.	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Levin v. U.S.	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	70
Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCC	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
City of Arlington v. FCC	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	40
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Recuse	Reverse	30
Millbrook v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
McBurney v. Young	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	30
PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	20
McQuiggin v. Perkins	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Trevino v. Thaler	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Maryland v. King	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Peugh v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Recuse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Shelby County v. Holder	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A.	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	40
Sebelius v. Cloer	Reverse	Reverse	Recuse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	30
Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	20
Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Recuse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Lefemine v. Wideman	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Tennant v. Jefferson County Commission	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Recuse	Affirm	Affirm	-
American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
U.S. Davila	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
U.S. v. Kebodeaux	Recuse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	-
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Metrish v. Lancaster	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	30
Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Willis of Colorado Inc. v. Troice	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Agency for Int'l Deveopment v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Recuse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Bond v. U.S.	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Recuse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Hillman v. Maretta	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Salinas v. Texas	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Sekhar v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-

Change FantasySCOTUS Member: narcher007

Leagues

Predictions

Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: narcher007