Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: wah38team

Joined:	January 26, 2013
Predictions:	75 / 171 ( 44%)
Points:	2,570
Ranking (2012):	14
Ranking (2011):	Unranked

Leagues

wah38team is a member of the following leagues:

Law Student Team Competition

Predictions

Case	Roberts	Scalia	Kennedy	Thomas	Ginsburg	Breyer	Alito	Sotomayor	Kagan	Prediction	Points
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	30
Johnson v. Williams	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	100
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Recuse	Affirm	-
Moncrieffe v. Holder	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	30
Clapper v. Amnesty International	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Chaidez v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	70
Bailey v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	30
Florida v. Jardines	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	60
Florida v. Harris	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	100
Comcast v. Behrend	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	50
Evans v. Michigan	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Marx v. General Revenue Corp.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	80
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Vance v. Ball State University	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	100
FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	100
U.S. Airways v. McCutchen	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	60
Chafin v. Chafin	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	50
The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	30
Henderson v. U.S.	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	100
Descamps v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause?	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing?	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles?	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction?	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing?	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A.	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	80
Maracich v. Spears	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	-
Missouri v. McNeely	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	50
Alleyne v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Levin v. U.S.	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	100
Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCC	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
City of Arlington v. FCC	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	40
Gunn v. Minton	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	100
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Millbrook v. U.S.	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	20
McBurney v. Young	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
McQuiggin v. Perkins	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Trevino v. Thaler	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Maryland v. King	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Peugh v. U.S.	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Recuse	Affirm	Reverse	-
Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	60
Shelby County v. Holder	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Sebelius v. Cloer	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Recuse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
U.S. Davila	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
U.S. v. Kebodeaux	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Metrish v. Lancaster	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	50
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Agency for Int'l Deveopment v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Recuse	Affirm	-
Hillman v. Maretta	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Salinas v. Texas	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Sekhar v. U.S.	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-

Change FantasySCOTUS Member: wah38team

Leagues

Predictions

Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: wah38team