
Change FantasySCOTUS Member: LolKatz
Change
| Joined: | January 26, 2013 |
| Predictions: | 36 / 178 ( 20%) |
| Points: | 1,620 |
| Ranking (2012): | 105 |
| Ranking (2011): | Unranked |
| Law School: | University of Louisville Louis D Brandeis School of Law |
Leagues
LolKatz is a member of the following leagues:
The TWEN League, University of Louisville Louis D Brandeis School of Law
Predictions
| Case | Roberts | Scalia | Kennedy | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | Sotomayor | Kagan | Prediction | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Recuse | Reverse | - |
| Chaidez v. U.S. | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |
| Alleyne v. U.S. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 80 |
| Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Levin v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Bowman v. Monsanto Co. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Maryland v. King | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 100 |
| Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 60 |
| Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | - |
| U.S. Davila | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. v. Kebodeaux | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | - |
| Metrish v. Lancaster | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 60 |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |
| Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |