RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up


Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: TabC2002

Joined:January 24, 2013
Predictions:65 / 172 ( 38%)
Points:980
Ranking (2012):75
Ranking (2011):Unranked
Law School:Washburn University School of Law

Leagues

TabC2002 is a member of the following leagues:

The TWEN League, Washburn University School of Law

Predictions

CaseRobertsScaliaKennedyThomasGinsburgBreyerAlitoSotomayorKaganPredictionPoints
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch PetroleumReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmAffirm50
Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinAffirmReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverse-
Moncrieffe v. HolderAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseRecuseAffirm60
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & SonsAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirm40
Florida v. JardinesAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirm50
Comcast v. BehrendAffirmReverseAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirm60
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Vance v. Ball State UniversityAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykAffirmReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmAffirmAffirm60
U.S. Airways v. McCutchenReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirm40
Descamps v. U.S.AffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverse-
United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction?AffirmReverseAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseAffirm-
Georgia-Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmRecuseAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirm20
Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A.AffirmAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmAffirm30
Maracich v. SpearsReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverse-
Missouri v. McNeelyReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Alleyne v. U.S.AffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseRecuseAffirm-
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management DistrictReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverse-
Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCCAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirm-
City of Arlington v. FCCAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmAffirm40
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.ReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverse20
Millbrook v. U.S.ReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverse50
McBurney v. YoungReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseReverse60
McQuiggin v. PerkinsAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverse-
Trevino v. ThalerAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseAffirmRecuseAffirm-
Maryland v. KingAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmRecuseAffirm-
Peugh v. U.S.ReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseRecuseAffirmReverse-
Shelby County v. HolderReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseRecuseAffirm-
Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of ArizonaReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A.ReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Sebelius v. CloerReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverse20
Dan's City Used Cars v. PelkeyAffirmReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmAffirm50
Horne v. Dep't of AgricultureReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverse-
Federal Trade Commission v. ActavisAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseRecuseAffirmReverseAffirm-
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. SutterAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmAffirm-
Lefemine v. WidemanAffirmAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverse-
Tennant v. Jefferson County CommissionAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverse-
Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
American Trucking Associations v. City of Los AngelesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad GeneticsReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Tarrant Regional Water District v. HerrmannAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseAffirm-
U.S. DavilaReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverse-
U.S. v. KebodeauxReverseAffirmAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverse-
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverse-
Metrish v. LancasterReverseReverseAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverse50
Proskauer Rose LLP v. TroiceReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverse-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverse-
Willis of Colorado Inc. v. TroiceReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverse-
Agency for Int'l Deveopment v. Alliance for Open Society Int'lAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseReverse-
Bond v. U.S.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverse-
Hillman v. MarettaReverseReverseReverseAffirmAffirmReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. BartlettAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseAffirm-
Salinas v. TexasAffirmAffirmAffirmAffirmReverseReverseAffirmReverseReverseAffirm-
Sekhar v. U.S.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseAffirmReverseAffirmReverse-