Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: sammy899

Joined:	December 3, 2012
Predictions:	88 / 189 ( 47%)
Points:	1,500
Ranking (2012):	74
Ranking (2011):	Unranked
Law School:	Cleveland State University Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Leagues

sammy899 is a member of the following leagues:

Cleveland State University Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, The TWEN League

Predictions

Case	Roberts	Scalia	Kennedy	Thomas	Ginsburg	Breyer	Alito	Sotomayor	Kagan	Prediction	Points
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	60
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Moncrieffe v. Holder	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	40
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	30
Florida v. Jardines	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	50
Comcast v. Behrend	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	40
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	30
Vance v. Ball State University	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	40
U.S. Airways v. McCutchen	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	30
The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	40
Descamps v. U.S.	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause?	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Recuse	Affirm	-
Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing?	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles?	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction?	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing?	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Georgia-Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	30
Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	60
Maracich v. Spears	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Missouri v. McNeely	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	70
Alleyne v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Levin v. U.S.	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	60
Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCC	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
City of Arlington v. FCC	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	30
Gunn v. Minton	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	30
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	50
Millbrook v. U.S.	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	40
McBurney v. Young	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	50
PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	40
McQuiggin v. Perkins	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	-
Trevino v. Thaler	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	-
Maryland v. King	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Peugh v. U.S.	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	-
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Shelby County v. Holder	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	-
Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	30
Sebelius v. Cloer	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	50
Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	40
Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Lefemine v. Wideman	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Tennant v. Jefferson County Commission	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
U.S. Davila	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
U.S. v. Kebodeaux	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	-
Metrish v. Lancaster	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	40
Proskauer Rose LLP v. Troice	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Willis of Colorado Inc. v. Troice	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Agency for Int'l Deveopment v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Bond v. U.S.	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	-
Hillman v. Maretta	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	-
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	-
Salinas v. Texas	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	-
Sekhar v. U.S.	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-

Change FantasySCOTUS Member: sammy899

Leagues

Predictions

Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: sammy899