
Change FantasySCOTUS Member: BrendanBarnes
Change
| Joined: | June 20, 2012 |
| Predictions: | 45 / 172 ( 26%) |
| Points: | 1,260 |
| Ranking (2012): | Unranked |
| Ranking (2011): | Unranked |
| Law School: | Hofstra University School of Law |
Leagues
BrendanBarnes is a member of the following leagues:
Hofstra University School of Law, The TWEN League
Predictions
| Case | Roberts | Scalia | Kennedy | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | Sotomayor | Kagan | Prediction | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCC v. Fox | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Knox v. Service Employees Int'l Union | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| United States v. Alvarez | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Arizona v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Recuse | Affirm | 50 |
| Southern Union Company v. United States | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Jackson v. Hobbs | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Miller v. Alabama | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is suit permitted by the Anti-Injunction Act?) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 30 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is Mandate Unconstitutional?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 80 |
| Florida v. Dept of HHS (Is the Medicaid expansion constitutional?) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 80 |
| National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (Is the Mandate Severable?) | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 20 |
| Dorsey v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Hill v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Johnson v. Williams | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 30 |
| Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Clapper v. Amnesty International | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Henderson v. U.S. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 70 |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause? | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing? | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles? | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Alleyne v. U.S. | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 30 |
| Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | - |
| City of Arlington v. FCC | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Bowman v. Monsanto Co. | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 50 |
| McBurney v. Young | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | 20 |
| American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Shelby County v. Holder | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 20 |
| Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Recuse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 20 |
| Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 50 |