Change FantasySCOTUS Member: MattyFatSacks
Change
| Joined: | January 26, 2012 |
| Predictions: | 35 / 165 ( 21%) |
| Points: | 2,230 |
| Ranking (2012): | Unranked |
| Ranking (2011): | 56 |
Leagues
MattyFatSacks is not a member of any leagues.
Predictions
| Case | Roberts | Scalia | Kennedy | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | Sotomayor | Kagan | Prediction | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is Mandate Unconstitutional?) | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is suit permitted by the Anti-Injunction Act?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Florida v. Dept of HHS (Is the Medicaid expansion constitutional?) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 70 |
| Arizona v. United States | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Recuse | Affirm | 30 |
| Armour v. Indianapolis | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 40 |
| Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 20 |
| United States v. Alvarez | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Zivotofsky v. Clinton | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 10 |
| FCC v. Fox | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Recuse | Affirm | Reverse | 60 |
| Martinez v. Ryan | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 50 |
| Knox v. Service Employees Int'l Union | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 70 |
| RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 60 |
| Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Reichle v. Howards | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (Is the Mandate Severable?) | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 30 |
| Southern Union Company v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Hill v. United States | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Williams v. Illinois | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Elgin v. Dep’t of the Treasury | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Astrue v. Capato | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | 60 |
| Blueford v. Arkansas | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 100 |
| Holder v. Sawyers | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Salazar v. Patchak | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 70 |
| Dorsey v. United States | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Miller v. Alabama | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Jackson v. Hobbs | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 60 |
| Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Kloeckner v. Solis | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. v. Bormes | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | 60 |