Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: tk.hayden131@yahoo.com

Joined:	January 18, 2012
Predictions:	58 / 164 ( 35%)
Points:	2,900
Ranking (2012):	Unranked
Ranking (2011):	24
Law School:	Michigan State University College of Law

Leagues

tk.hayden131@yahoo.com is a member of the following leagues:

Michigan State University College of Law, The TWEN League

Predictions

Case	Roberts	Scalia	Kennedy	Thomas	Ginsburg	Breyer	Alito	Sotomayor	Kagan	Prediction	Points
U.S. v. Home Concrete & Supply	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	50
Holder v. Gutierrez	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
Holder v. Sawyers	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
Vartelas v. Holder	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	70
Astrue v. Capato	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	30
Armour v. Indianapolis	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	50
Arizona v. United States	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	40
National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (Is the Mandate Severable?)	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	60
Florida v. Dept of HHS (Is the Medicaid expansion constitutional?)	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	10
Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is suit permitted by the Anti-Injunction Act?)	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is Mandate Unconstitutional?)	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	30
Filarsky v. Delia	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	30
Roberts v. Sea-Land Services	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	20
Coleman v. Maryland Ct. of Appeals	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	40
Knox v. Service Employees Int'l Union	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	40
FCC v. Fox	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	20
Sackett v. EPA	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	30
Kappos v. Hyatt	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	40
PPL Montana v. Montana	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	40
Mayo v. Prometheus Laboratories	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	60
Williams v. Illinois	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Martel v. Clair	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	-
Messerschmidt v. Millender	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	80
Caraco Laboratories v. Novo Nordisk	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	40
Setser v. US	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
FAA v. Cooper	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
Hall v. US	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	40
Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	30
Kurns v. R.R. Friction Products Grp.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	80
Zivotofsky v. Clinton	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	40
Kawashima v. Holder	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	80
Rehberg v. Paulk	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	100
Missouri v. Frye	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	50
Lafler v. Cooper	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	50
Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Martinez v. Ryan	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	50
Howes v. Fields	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	50
Douglas v. Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	20
Douglas v. Indep. Living Ctr of S. Cal.	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	20
Douglas v. Cal. Pharmacists Ass'n	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	20
Wood v. Milyard	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
United States v. Alvarez	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	10
Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	60
Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
Salazar v. Patchak	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	20
Blueford v. Arkansas	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	60
Reichle v. Howards	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	60
RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	80
Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	50
Miller v. Alabama	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	80
Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	70
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	30
Jackson v. Hobbs	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Hill v. United States	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	70
Dorsey v. United States	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	70
Elgin v. Dep’t of the Treasury	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	40
Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc.	Affirm	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Affirm	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	Reverse	40

Change FantasySCOTUS Member: tk.hayden131@yahoo.com

Leagues

Predictions

Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: tk.hayden131@yahoo.com