
Change FantasySCOTUS Member: jlbyellin
Change
| Joined: | November 14, 2011 |
| Predictions: | 41 / 171 ( 24%) |
| Points: | 1,480 |
| Ranking (2012): | Unranked |
| Ranking (2011): | 94 |
Leagues
jlbyellin is not a member of any leagues.
Predictions
| Case | Roberts | Scalia | Kennedy | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | Sotomayor | Kagan | Prediction | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCC v. Fox | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Recuse | Affirm | Reverse | 60 |
| Hall v. US | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Arizona v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Recuse | Affirm | 40 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is Mandate Unconstitutional?) | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is suit permitted by the Anti-Injunction Act?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Florida v. Dept of HHS (Is the Medicaid expansion constitutional?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 20 |
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 50 |
| Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 50 |
| Knox v. Service Employees Int'l Union | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 70 |
| Southern Union Company v. United States | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 30 |
| Miller v. Alabama | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 80 |
| Jackson v. Hobbs | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 80 |
| Dorsey v. United States | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Hill v. United States | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 100 |
| Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 30 |
| Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (Is the Mandate Severable?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Alvarez | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 60 |
| Williams v. Illinois | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Salazar v. Patchak | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 50 |
| Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 20 |
| Johnson v. Williams | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Recuse | Reverse | - |
| Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Vance v. Ball State University | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles? | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Shelby County v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | - |