Change FantasySCOTUS Member: ZMW29
Change
| Joined: | October 30, 2011 |
| Predictions: | 82 / 165 ( 50%) |
| Points: | 4,580 |
| Ranking (2012): | Unranked |
| Ranking (2011): | 8 |
| Law School: | Creighton University School of Law |
Leagues
ZMW29 is a member of the following leagues:
Creighton University School of Law, The Elect League, The TWEN League
Predictions
| Case | Roberts | Scalia | Kennedy | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | Sotomayor | Kagan | Prediction | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Blueford v. Arkansas | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Elgin v. Dep’t of the Treasury | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Filarsky v. Delia | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Holder v. Sawyers | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Williams v. Illinois | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Coleman v. Maryland Ct. of Appeals | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| United States v. Alvarez | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Reynolds v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Knox v. Service Employees Int'l Union | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Roberts v. Sea-Land Services | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 10 |
| Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Sackett v. EPA | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Kappos v. Hyatt | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| FCC v. Fox | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| PPL Montana v. Montana | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| United States v. Jones | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Reichle v. Howards | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Salazar v. Patchak | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 10 |
| Perry v. Perez (Texas State House) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Perry v. Perez (Texas Congressional Delegation) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Perry v. Davis (Texas State Senate) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 10 |
| Hill v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Dorsey v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Arizona v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Perry v. New Hampshire | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 10 |
| Holder v. Gutierrez | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Armour v. Indianapolis | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Astrue v. Capato | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Jackson v. Hobbs | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Miller v. Alabama | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| U.S. v. Home Concrete & Supply | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Mayo v. Prometheus Laboratories | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Martel v. Clair | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Messerschmidt v. Millender | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Caraco Laboratories v. Novo Nordisk | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Setser v. US | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| FAA v. Cooper | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Hall v. US | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Mims v. Arrow Financial Services | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Nat'l Meat Ass'n v. Harris | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Vartelas v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Wood v. Milyard | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Kurns v. R.R. Friction Products Grp. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is Mandate Unconstitutional?) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Douglas v. Cal. Pharmacists Ass'n | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Douglas v. Indep. Living Ctr of S. Cal. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Douglas v. Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Howes v. Fields | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Maples v. Thomas | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Kawashima v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Zivotofsky v. Clinton | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Smith v. Cain | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Gonzalez v. Thaler | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Rehberg v. Paulk | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Minneci v. Pollard | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Missouri v. Frye | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Lafler v. Cooper | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Judulang v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Pac. Operators Offshore v. Valladolid | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Compucredit v. Greenwood | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Golan v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 20 |
| Martinez v. Ryan | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is suit permitted by the Anti-Injunction Act?) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Florida v. Dept of HHS (Is the Medicaid expansion constitutional?) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (Is the Mandate Severable?) | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Southern Union Company v. United States | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Kloeckner v. Solis | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. v. Bormes | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |