RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up


Change
FantasySCOTUS Member: ZMW29

Joined:October 30, 2011
Predictions (All Time):81 / 237 ( 34%)
Points (Current Year):-
Ranking (2013):Unranked
Ranking (2012):Unranked
Law School:Creighton University School of Law

Leagues

ZMW29 is a member of the following leagues:

Creighton University School of Law, The Elect League, The TWEN League

Predictions

CaseRobertsScaliaKennedyThomasGinsburgBreyerAlitoSotomayorKaganPredictionPoints
Salazar v. Ramah Navajo ChapterReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Blueford v. ArkansasReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse30
Elgin v. Dep’t of the TreasuryReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse30
Filarsky v. DeliaReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Holder v. SawyersReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch PetroleumReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Williams v. IllinoisReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Coleman v. Maryland Ct. of AppealsReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
United States v. AlvarezReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse30
Reynolds v. United StatesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Knox v. Service Employees Int'l UnionReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Roberts v. Sea-Land ServicesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse10
Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse60
Sackett v. EPAReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Kappos v. HyattReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
FCC v. FoxReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
PPL Montana v. MontanaReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
United States v. JonesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Reichle v. HowardsReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Salazar v. PatchakReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse10
Perry v. Perez (Texas State House)ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Perry v. Perez (Texas Congressional Delegation)ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Perry v. Davis (Texas State Senate)ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. PatchakReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse10
Hill v. United StatesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse50
Dorsey v. United StatesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse50
Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Arizona v. United StatesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
Perry v. New HampshireReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse10
Holder v. GutierrezReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Armour v. IndianapolisReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse30
Astrue v. CapatoReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Jackson v. HobbsReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse50
Miller v. AlabamaReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse50
U.S. v. Home Concrete & SupplyReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Mayo v. Prometheus LaboratoriesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Martel v. ClairReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Messerschmidt v. MillenderReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Caraco Laboratories v. Novo NordiskReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Setser v. USReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse30
FAA v. CooperReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse50
Hall v. USReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Mims v. Arrow Financial ServicesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Nat'l Meat Ass'n v. HarrisReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Vartelas v. HolderReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse60
Wood v. MilyardReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Kurns v. R.R. Friction Products Grp.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse30
Credit Suisse Securities v. SimmondsReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is Mandate Unconstitutional?)ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse50
Douglas v. Cal. Pharmacists Ass'nReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Douglas v. Indep. Living Ctr of S. Cal.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Douglas v. Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp.ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Howes v. FieldsReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Maples v. ThomasReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Kawashima v. HolderReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse30
Zivotofsky v. ClintonReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
Smith v. CainReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
Gonzalez v. ThalerReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Rehberg v. PaulkReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Minneci v. PollardReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
Missouri v. FryeReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Lafler v. CooperReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Judulang v. HolderReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Florence v. Bd. of Chosen FreeholdersReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Pac. Operators Offshore v. ValladolidReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Compucredit v. GreenwoodReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse80
Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOCReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Golan v. HolderReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse20
Martinez v. RyanReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is suit permitted by the Anti-Injunction Act?)ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Florida v. Dept of HHS (Is the Medicaid expansion constitutional?)ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (Is the Mandate Severable?)ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
Southern Union Company v. United StatesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse60
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch PetroleumReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse-
Lozman v. City of Riviera BeachReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse70
Kloeckner v. SolisReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
U.S. v. BormesReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse100
United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction?ReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse40
Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverseReverse50