Change FantasySCOTUS Member: simoncowell
Change
| Joined: | October 3, 2011 |
| Predictions: | 133 / 187 ( 71%) |
| Points: | 6,570 |
| Ranking (2012): | 23 |
| Ranking (2011): | 17 |
| Law School: | University of Akron School of Law |
Leagues
simoncowell is a member of the following leagues:
Law Student Team Competition , The Elect League, The TWEN League, University of Akron School of Law
Predictions
| Case | Roberts | Scalia | Kennedy | Thomas | Ginsburg | Breyer | Alito | Sotomayor | Kagan | Prediction | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds | Recuse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Hall v. US | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 70 |
| FAA v. Cooper | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Recuse | Reverse | 100 |
| Setser v. US | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 60 |
| Caraco Laboratories v. Novo Nordisk | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Maples v. Thomas | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 60 |
| Douglas v. Cal. Pharmacists Ass'n | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 70 |
| Douglas v. Indep. Living Ctr of S. Cal. | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 70 |
| Douglas v. Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp. | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 70 |
| Reynolds v. United States | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 20 |
| Howes v. Fields | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Martinez v. Ryan | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Golan v. Holder | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 60 |
| Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | 70 |
| Compucredit v. Greenwood | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | 80 |
| Greene v. Fisher | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Pac. Operators Offshore v. Valladolid | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Judulang v. Holder | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 40 |
| Nat'l Meat Ass'n v. Harris | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Kurns v. R.R. Friction Products Grp. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| United States v. Jones | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| Zivotofsky v. Clinton | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 60 |
| Kawashima v. Holder | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Rehberg v. Paulk | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 20 |
| Missouri v. Frye | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | 60 |
| Lafler v. Cooper | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (Is the Mandate Severable?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 10 |
| Florida v. Dept of HHS (Is the Medicaid expansion constitutional?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 20 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is suit permitted by the Anti-Injunction Act?) | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| Dept. of HHS v. Florida (Is Mandate Unconstitutional?) | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Messerschmidt v. Millender | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Martel v. Clair | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 10 |
| Williams v. Illinois | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Mayo v. Prometheus Laboratories | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| PPL Montana v. Montana | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Kappos v. Hyatt | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | 20 |
| Sackett v. EPA | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| FCC v. Fox | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Recuse | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Coleman v. Maryland Ct. of Appeals | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Roberts v. Sea-Land Services | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| Filarsky v. Delia | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. v. Home Concrete & Supply | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 60 |
| Holder v. Gutierrez | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Vartelas v. Holder | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Holder v. Sawyers | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 40 |
| Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd. | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Blueford v. Arkansas | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 100 |
| United States v. Alvarez | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 70 |
| Elgin v. Dep’t of the Treasury | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Wood v. Milyard | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Armour v. Indianapolis | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 70 |
| Knox v. Service Employees Int'l Union | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | 80 |
| Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 60 |
| Johnson v. Williams | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Recuse | Reverse | - |
| Moncrieffe v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 40 |
| Clapper v. Amnesty International | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Florida v. Jardines | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 50 |
| Comcast v. Behrend | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| Marx v. General Revenue Corp. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 70 |
| Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 70 |
| Vance v. Ball State University | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. Airways v. McCutchen | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Descamps v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Does Prop 8 Violate the Equal Protection Clause? | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Hollingsworth v. Perry - Do Petitioners Have Standing? | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does DOMA violation the Equal Protection Component of the 5th Amendment or Federalism Principles? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does SG's agreement with 2nd Circuit deprive SCOTUS of jurisdiction? | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| United States v. Windsor - Does Counsel for House of Representatives have Standing? | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Georgia-Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Recuse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 80 |
| Delia (Wos) v. E.M.A. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 30 |
| Maracich v. Spears | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Missouri v. McNeely | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Alleyne v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 50 |
| Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Levin v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Cable Telecom., and Tech. v. FCC | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| City of Arlington v. FCC | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |
| Bowman v. Monsanto Co. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Millbrook v. U.S. | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| McBurney v. Young | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 50 |
| PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 40 |
| McQuiggin v. Perkins | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 10 |
| Trevino v. Thaler | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | 80 |
| Maryland v. King | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 70 |
| Peugh v. U.S. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | 60 |
| American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Recuse | Reverse | Reverse | - |
| Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Shelby County v. Holder | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Arizona v. The Inter Trial Council of Arizona | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 70 |
| Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Sebelius v. Cloer | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | 100 |
| Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Recuse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | 40 |
| Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Reverse | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | - |
| Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. Davila | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 100 |
| U.S. v. Kebodeaux | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Reverse | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | Affirm | - |
| Salinas v. Texas | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | Reverse | 40 |