RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up

Sprint Communications Company v. Jacobs

Sign up to make a prediciton!

« Back to the case list

Case Term OT 2013
Category Business Law
Question Presented Whether the Eighth Circuit erred by concluding that Younger abstention is warranted not only when there is a related state proceeding that is “coercive” but also when there is a related state proceeding that is, instead, “remedial.”
Lower Court's Decision No
Research for TWEN users
by Westlaw
Westlaw

Merit Briefs:

Certiorari-Stage Documents:

Outcome - Reverse

This case was decided on 09 December, 2013.

Roberts
Robertsremand
Scalia
Scaliaremand
Kennedy
Kennedyremand
Thomas
Thomasremand
Ginsburg
Ginsburgremand
Breyer
Breyerremand
Alito
Alitoremand
Sotomayor
Sotomayorremand
Kagan
Kaganremand