RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up

Ryan v. Gonzales

Sign up to make a prediciton!

« Back to the case list

Case Term OT 2012
Category Criminal Law
Question Presented Did the Ninth Circuit err when it held that 18 U.S.C. § 3599(a)(2) - which provides that an indigent capital state inmate pursuing federal habeas relief “shall be entitled to the appointment of one or more attorneys” - impliedly entitles a death row inmate to stay the federal habeas proceedings he initiated if he is not competent to assist counsel?
Lower Court's Decision No
Research for TWEN users
by Westlaw
Westlaw

Merit Briefs:

Certiorari-Stage Documents:

Outcome - Reverse

This case was decided on 07 January, 2013.

Roberts
Robertsremand
Scalia
Scaliaremand
Kennedy
Kennedyremand
Thomas
Thomasremand
Ginsburg
Ginsburgremand
Breyer
Breyerremand
Alito
Alitoremand
Sotomayor
Sotomayorremand
Kagan
Kaganremand