RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up

Maples v. Thomas

Sign up to make a prediciton!

« Back to the case list

Case Term OT 2011
Category Criminal Law
Question Presented Whether, in a capital case, there is no "cause" to excuse any procedural default where petitioner was blameless for the default, the State's own conduct contributed to the default, and petitioner's attorneys of record were no longer functioning as his agents at the time of any default.
Lower Court's Decision Yes
Research for TWEN users
by Westlaw
Westlaw
  • Oral Argument Transcript
  • Merit Briefs:

    Certiorari-Stage Documents:

    Outcome - Reverse

    This case was decided on 18 January, 2012.

    Roberts
    Robertsremand
    Scalia
    Scaliaaffirm
    Kennedy
    Kennedyremand
    Thomas
    Thomasaffirm
    Ginsburg
    Ginsburgremand
    Breyer
    Breyerremand
    Alito
    Alitoremand
    Sotomayor
    Sotomayorremand
    Kagan
    Kaganremand