RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up

Lane v. Franks

Sign up to make a prediciton!

« Back to the case list

Case Term OT 2013
Category
Question Presented (1) Whether the government is categorically free under the First Amendment to retaliate against a public employee for truthful sworn testimony that was compelled by subpoena and was not a part of the employee’s ordinary job responsibilities; and (2) whether qualified immunity precludes a claim for damages in such an action.
Lower Court's Decision
Research for TWEN users
by Westlaw
Westlaw

Merit Briefs:

Certiorari-Stage Documents:

Outcome - Reverse

This case was decided on 19 June, 2014.

Roberts
Robertsremand
Scalia
Scaliaremand
Kennedy
Kennedyremand
Thomas
Thomasremand
Ginsburg
Ginsburgremand
Breyer
Breyerremand
Alito
Alitoremand
Sotomayor
Sotomayorremand
Kagan
Kaganremand