Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District
Sign up to make a prediciton!
|Case Term||OT 2012|
|Question Presented||(1) Whether a land-use agency can be held liable for a taking when it refused to issue a land-use permit on the sole basis that the permit applicant did not accede to a permit condition that, if applied, would violate the essential nexus and rough proportionality tests set out in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) (2) Whether the nexus and proportionality tests set out in Nollan and Dolan apply to a land-use exaction that takes the form of a government demand that a permit applicant dedicate money, services, labor, or any other type of personal property to a public use.|
|Lower Court's Decision|
|Research for TWEN users
Outcome - Reverse
This case was decided on 24 June, 2013.