Kansas v. Cheever
Sign up to make a prediciton!
|Case Term||OT 2013|
|Question Presented||Whether, when a criminal defendant affirmatively introduces expert testimony that he lacked the requisite mental state to commit capital murder ... due to the alleged temporary and long-term effects of the defendant’s methamphetamine use, the state violates the defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by rebutting the defendant’s mental state defense with evidence from a court-ordered mental evaluation of the defendant.|
|Lower Court's Decision||Yes|
|Research for TWEN users
Predictions are locked right now...
Please visit this page again later.