RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up

Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis

Sign up to make a prediciton!

« Back to the case list

Case Term OT 2012
Category Business Law
Question Presented Whether reverse-payment agreements are per se lawful unless the underlying patent litigation was a sham or the patent was obtained by fraud (as the court below held), or instead are presumptively anticompetitive and unlawful (as the Third Circuit has held). (Alito, J., recused)
Lower Court's Decision
Research for TWEN users
by Westlaw
Westlaw

Merit Briefs:

Certiorari-Stage Documents:

Outcome - Reverse

This case was decided on 16 June, 2013.

Roberts
Robertsaffirm
Scalia
Scaliaaffirm
Kennedy
Kennedyremand
Thomas
Thomasaffirm
Ginsburg
Ginsburgremand
Breyer
Breyerremand
Alito
Alitorecuse
Sotomayor
Sotomayorremand
Kagan
Kaganremand