Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis
Sign up to make a prediciton!
|Case Term||OT 2012|
|Question Presented||Whether reverse-payment agreements are per se lawful unless the underlying patent litigation was a sham or the patent was obtained by fraud (as the court below held), or instead are presumptively anticompetitive and unlawful (as the Third Circuit has held). (Alito, J., recused)|
|Lower Court's Decision|
|Research for TWEN users
Outcome - Reverse
This case was decided on 16 June, 2013.