RSS   Twitter   Sign inLogin or Sign-up

Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison

Sign up to make a prediciton!

« Back to the case list

Case Term OT 2013
Category Constitutional Law
Question Presented Whether Article III permits the exercise of the judicial power of the United States by bankruptcy courts on the basis of litigant consent, and, if so, whether "implied consent" based on a litigant’s conduct, where the statutory scheme provides the litigant no notice that its consent is required, is sufficient to satisfy Article III.
Lower Court's Decision No
Research for TWEN users
by Westlaw
Westlaw

Merit Briefs:

Certiorari-Stage Documents:

Outcome - Affirm

This case was decided on 08 June, 2014.

Roberts
Robertsaffirm
Scalia
Scaliaaffirm
Kennedy
Kennedyaffirm
Thomas
Thomasaffirm
Ginsburg
Ginsburgaffirm
Breyer
Breyeraffirm
Alito
Alitoaffirm
Sotomayor
Sotomayoraffirm
Kagan
Kaganaffirm