Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison
Sign up to make a prediciton!
|Case Term||OT 2013|
|Question Presented||Whether Article III permits the exercise of the judicial power of the United States by bankruptcy courts on the basis of litigant consent, and, if so, whether "implied consent" based on a litigant’s conduct, where the statutory scheme provides the litigant no notice that its consent is required, is sufficient to satisfy Article III.|
|Lower Court's Decision||No|
|Research for TWEN users