Environmental Protection Agency v. EME Homer City Generation
Sign up to make a prediciton!
|Case Term||OT 2013|
|Question Presented||Whether the EPA permissibly interpreted the statutory term “contribute significantly” so as to define each upwind state’s “significant” interstate air pollution contributions in light of the cost-effective emission reductions it can make to improve air quality in polluted downwind areas, or whether the Act instead unambiguously requires the EPA to consider only each upwind state’s physically proportionate responsibility for each downwind air quality problem.|
|Lower Court's Decision||Not Addressed|
|Research for TWEN users
Outcome - Reverse
This case was decided on 29 April, 2014.