« Back to the case list
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney
Want to make your own predictions?
Join Now!Case Profile
| Docket Number | 23-367 |
| Term | 2023 |
| Full Name | Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney |
| Short Name | Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney |
| Petitioner | None |
| Respondent | None |
| Date Argued (Reargued) | April 23, 2024 |
| Date Decided |
Question Presented
Whether courts must evaluate the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act using the traditional, stringent, four-factor test for preliminary injunctions or some other more lenient standard.
Live Case Prediction
- correct prediction- wrong prediction
| FantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction | {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction | Final SCOTUS Decision |
|---|---|---|
8 Reverse1 Affirm | 0 Reverse0 Affirm | 0 Reverse0 Affirm |
Live Justice Predictions
- correct prediction- wrong prediction
| Justice |
FantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction | {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction | Final SCOTUS Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
 John G. Roberts, Jr. | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Clarence Thomas | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Samuel A. Alito | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Sonia Sotomayor | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Elena Kagan | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Neil Gorsuch | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Brett M. Kavanaugh | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Amy Coney Barrett | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... | |
 Ketanji Brown Jackson | Prediction pending... | Outcome pending... |
Case Events
| No | Date | Description |
|---|
Case Counsels
| Name | Party Name | Description | Address | Phone | Type |
|---|
© 2014-2019 Josh Blackman LLC Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Rules